We’re Only Human (and Why That’s a Good Thing)
The fear around AI is particularly acute in qual research because the work we do is fundamentally of a human nature. Quantitative research translates human attitudes and behaviors into numbers. Qualitative research, on the other hand, is all about complexity, lived experience, and subjective interpretation inherent in being human. With its calculated algorithms and machine learning, AI seems antithetical to the very core of qual.
But AI doesn’t have to mean the death of qual market research, or the obsolescence of the human researchers and moderators who conduct it. Rather, we believe that AI can illuminate what matters most to researchers and the clients who hire them. By letting AI tools do all the heavy lifting—data processing, transcribing, pattern finding, and report generating—researchers can focus on what they do best: uncovering and interpreting context, nuance, and human emotion that underpin truly difference-making insight. And making this insight more accessible to stakeholders.
Instead of eroding the quality of qual insights, AI can help human researchers enhance it. So it’s no longer AI vs. Humans, but AI + Humans. For this harmonious partnership to happen, however, we must clearly differentiate what AI is good at, and what human researchers are good at.
Recognizing Patterns vs. Recognizing Emotions
AI is awesome at summarizing transcripts, clustering comments, flagging themes, and calling out patterns that take the human eye much longer to recognize. Human researcher are good at experiencing the emotional weight of study participants’ responses, the subtle ways people frame their answers. We see the nuances that AI simply can’t.
AI is also a great tool for conducting real-time analysis during field work, alerting moderators to emerging themes for further exploration. The human researcher knows how to act on this information, quickly pivoting to adjust the line of questioning and delve deeper.
Yes, it’s important to make note of recurring themes. But it’s also important to interpret and make sense of those patterns. That’s where human researchers excel, bringing to bear their cultural awareness, psychological understanding, industry expertise, and empathy—all qualities that exceed the capabilities of the algorithm.
Raw Data vs. Strategic Guidance
AI is fantastic at summarizing massive amounts of data in seconds. But clients don’t just want the facts; they need strategic guidance to help with critical business decision making. After all, that’s what they’re paying for. They want to know how respondent sentiment connects to product strategy, brand positioning, and business goals. Human researchers provide that interpretive bridge, closing the gap between cold-hard data and actionable insight. AI lays the scaffolding, while human researchers build and refine the structure.
Human researchers can harness AI’s report-generating prowess to help connect the dots for stakeholders. AI can quickly sift through lengthy slide decks to pull out the most relevant and compelling quotes. It can create heat maps of themes, word clouds, and other interactive visuals that make it easier to share findings in a way that’s most meaningful to stakeholders.